Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yes, you were right. Turns out these identical points were due to some data truncation error. Datatype specification was making the points identical in the python code that I used to generate the IC. This has been corrected and the issue is fixed. However, now the code doesn’t proceed beyond the following message (you can get it in output-log.txt). The code just keeps on running. It has been more than 10 hours but the code doesn’t progress beyond this message.
DOMAIN: Peano-Hilbert order done, took 0.594324 sec.
Relevant files had been shared by email as the form doesn’t support posting the link.Thanks a lot Rainer. For some unknown reason when I pasted this link, the post doesn’t show up in the forum. I have shared you the link via e-mail.
But in all cases, I have ensured that boxsize is not sharter than the boxsize in the IC file. But I still get the same error.
Hi Rainer,
This is hapenning right on start up.
I increased the box size to a value bit larger than the xmax, ymax and zmax values in the IC file. Now the code runs but there is no progress beyond
DOMAIN: Peano-Hilbert order done, took 0.052613 sec.
Arepo just keeps on running without any progress until the entire job execution time.
I wish to share the links to the IC, output dump, and param files but the forum doesn’t allow that. Please let me know if there is an alternative.Thanks a lot Rainer! That helps a lot. Sorry for the super late reply. Can you suggest a way that I can implement a very simple cooling function to be read from a file (say a text file with two columns Temperature and Cooling rate Lambda)?
I was actually playing around with some custom cooling functions for some idealized simulations and wish to test them out on Arepo.TimeMax in the Parameter file controls the final time of the simulation in code units. For Cosmological runs please refer to the manual. Hope this helps.
